West Midlands International Airport Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2008] EWHC 2309 (Admin) (06 October 2008)
The court held that the Secretaries of State's decision to refuse planning permission for the new passenger terminal at Coventry Airport was lawful. The Inspector's and Secretaries of State's reasoning on sustainability, fallback position, pollution, planning policy, and procedural fairness were within the bounds of planning judgment. The court found no material legal error, irrationality, or inadequacy of reasons that would justify quashing the decision under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 2309 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: West Midlands International Airport Limited; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Secretary of State for Transport; Third Defendant: Warwick District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law – Planning Appeal Challenge / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission, Section 288 Challenge, Sustainability, Public Transport Accessibility, Noise Pollution, Interpretation of Planning Policy, Adequacy of Reasons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
West Midlands International Airport Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Secretary of State for Transport
Second Defendant
Warwick District Council
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law – Planning Appeal Challenge / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretaries of State's decision to refuse planning permission for a new passenger terminal at Coventry Airport was lawful under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- 2 Whether the Inspector and Secretaries of State erred in their assessment of sustainability, fallback position, pollution, planning policy, and procedural fairness
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Secretaries of State's decision to refuse planning permission for the new passenger terminal at Coventry Airport was lawful. The Inspector's and Secretaries of State's reasoning on sustainability, fallback position, pollution, planning policy, and procedural fairness were within the bounds of planning judgment. The court found no material legal error, irrationality, or inadequacy of reasons that would justify quashing the decision under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The claim to quash the Secretaries of State's decision is refused.
- Planning permission for the new passenger terminal at Coventry Airport remains refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment