Smith & Anor v The First Secretary of State & Anor
The judge below was correct in rejecting all grounds of challenge to the inspector's decision for the reasons given; no legal error was established in the inspector's reasoning.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: N Smith (aka John Arthur and Lennie Smith); Defendant/respondent: The First Secretary of State; Defendant/respondent: Mid Bedfordshire District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission application adjourned to a court of three; appeal to follow if permission is granted.
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission, Gypsy Caravan Sites, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N Smith (aka John Arthur and Lennie Smith)
Claimant/appellant
The First Secretary of State
Defendant/respondent
Mid Bedfordshire District Council
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the planning inspector erred in law by considering proximity to other authorised sites as a relevant factor
- 2 Whether the inspector erred in law by concluding there was a trend of caravans moving from authorised to unauthorised sites
- 3 Whether planning policy can properly aim to contain gypsies on local authority sites
Ratio Decidendi
The judge below was correct in rejecting all grounds of challenge to the inspector's decision for the reasons given; no legal error was established in the inspector's reasoning.
Court Disposition
Permission application adjourned to a court of three; appeal to follow if permission is granted.
Orders
- Permission application adjourned to a court of three.
- Appeal to follow if permission is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment