Handoll & Ors v Messrs Warner Goodman And Streat (a firm) & Ors [1994] EWCA Civ 42 (09 December 1994)
A condition attached to a planning permission does not apply to a building constructed outside the land or scope of that permission; the permission and its conditions only enure for the benefit of the land identified in the application and approved by the authority.
- Citation
- [1994] EWCA Civ 42
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Colin Handoll; Plaintiff/appellant: Margaret Charlotte Ginette Handoll; Plaintiff/appellant: Muriel Hazel Suddick; Defendant/respondent: Messrs Warner Goodman and Streat; Defendant/respondent: Samuel John Cook; Defendant/respondent: June Cook; Defendant/respondent: East Lindsey District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission Conditions, Agricultural Occupancy Restriction, Enforcement of Planning Conditions, Land Identification in Planning Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colin Handoll
Plaintiff/appellant
Margaret Charlotte Ginette Handoll
Plaintiff/appellant
Muriel Hazel Suddick
Plaintiff/appellant
Messrs Warner Goodman and Streat
Defendant/respondent
Samuel John Cook
Defendant/respondent
June Cook
Defendant/respondent
East Lindsey District Council
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a condition restricting occupancy imposed on a planning permission applies to a building not authorised by that permission
Ratio Decidendi
A condition attached to a planning permission does not apply to a building constructed outside the land or scope of that permission; the permission and its conditions only enure for the benefit of the land identified in the application and approved by the authority.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Preliminary issue answered in the negative: the agricultural occupancy restriction does not apply to The Paddocks.
- Applicant's costs awarded; Legal Aid Taxation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment