Wall & Ors v Winchester City Council & Anor [2015] EWCA Civ 563 (17 March 2015)
The 2003 planning permission was for use as a travelling showpeoples' site only; use by non-travelling showpeople is not permitted by that permission and constitutes a material change of use. The Inspector erred in law by misapplying the principle in I'm Your Man and failing to determine whether a material change of use had occurred.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 563
- Parties
- Appellants: Mr M Wall, Mr M Black, Mrs S Wall, Mr D Birch, Mr D Carter, Mr M James; 1st Respondent: Winchester City Council; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (administrative Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission Interpretation, Material Change of Use, Enforcement Notices, Occupancy Restrictions, Ground (b) Appeals Under Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr M Wall, Mr M Black, Mrs S Wall, Mr D Birch, Mr D Carter, Mr M James
Appellants
Winchester City Council
1st Respondent
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (administrative Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2003 planning permission for use as a 'travelling showpeoples' site' permitted use as a general residential caravan site without restriction on occupancy
- 2 Whether the absence of an express occupancy condition meant there was no limitation on use
- 3 Whether the Inspector misapplied the principle in I'm Your Man Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
Ratio Decidendi
The 2003 planning permission was for use as a travelling showpeoples' site only; use by non-travelling showpeople is not permitted by that permission and constitutes a material change of use. The Inspector erred in law by misapplying the principle in I'm Your Man and failing to determine whether a material change of use had occurred.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellants' appeal dismissed
- Matter remitted to the Inspector to determine whether the 2003 planning permission was implemented, whether a material change of use occurred, and if so, whether planning permission should be granted for that change under ground (a)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment