Samuel Collingwood Smith v Esther Ruth Baker

Samuel Collingwood Smith v Esther Ruth Baker

Ms Baker's persistent failure to serve a compliant Amended Reply to Defence to Counterclaim, despite multiple opportunities and clear court orders, constituted a serious and significant breach with no good reason or prospect of remedy. Her pleadings remained defective, non-compliant, and incapable of supporting a sustainable claim. The court found no reasonable grounds for her counterclaim, no real prospect of success, and that further indulgence would be futile and disproportionate. Accordingly, the counterclaim was struck out and summary judgment entered against her.

Parties
Claimant/respondent to Counterclaim: Samuel Collingwood Smith; Defendant/counterclaimant: Esther Ruth Baker
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 August 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil (defamation and Harassment) / Ruling on Applications for Strike Out, Summary Judgment, and Relief From Sanctions
Outcome
Counterclaim struck out; summary judgment entered against Ms Baker; relief from sanctions and further time refused.
Legal Topics
Pleadings, Relief From Sanctions, Strike Out Applications, Summary Judgment, Practice Direction 53 B, Costs
Defamation Harassment Civil Procedure Pleadings Relief From Sanctions Strike Out Applications Summary Judgment Practice Direction 53 B +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Collingwood Smith

Claimant/respondent to Counterclaim

Esther Ruth Baker

Defendant/counterclaimant

Procedural Posture

Civil (defamation and Harassment) / Ruling on Applications for Strike Out, Summary Judgment, and Relief From Sanctions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Ms Baker should be granted relief from sanctions and further time to serve her Amended Reply to Defence to Counterclaim
  2. 2 Whether Ms Baker's counterclaim should be struck out and/or summary judgment entered against her for failure to comply with court orders and pleading requirements

Ratio Decidendi

Ms Baker's persistent failure to serve a compliant Amended Reply to Defence to Counterclaim, despite multiple opportunities and clear court orders, constituted a serious and significant breach with no good reason or prospect of remedy. Her pleadings remained defective, non-compliant, and incapable of supporting a sustainable claim. The court found no reasonable grounds for her counterclaim, no real prospect of success, and that further indulgence would be futile and disproportionate. Accordingly, the counterclaim was struck out and summary judgment entered against her.

Court Disposition

Counterclaim struck out; summary judgment entered against Ms Baker; relief from sanctions and further time refused.

Orders

  • Amended Counterclaim struck out
  • Relief from sanctions refused