Christopher Major v Chief Constable of Essex Police & Anor
It was necessary for Dr Cheng to issue a fresh report under paragraph 3(4) of Schedule 1 to the Police Pensions Regulations 2015, as a new medical condition (alcohol dependence) was identified in 2023 that was not present in the 2019 report. The absence of such a report meant the claimant's right of appeal had not arisen, and the court declared that a fresh report must be issued, after which the right of appeal will be available.
- Parties
- Claimant: Christopher Major; First Defendant: Chief Constable of Essex Police; Second Defendant: Dr William Cheng
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part (judicial review succeeds on Ground 2, fails on Ground 1)
- Legal Topics
- Police Pensions, Judicial Review Procedure, Medical Retirement, Appeals and Reconsiderations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Major
Claimant
Chief Constable of Essex Police
First Defendant
Dr William Cheng
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to appeal the decision of the Selected Medical Practitioner following a reconsideration under the Police Pensions Regulations 2015
- 2 Whether the referral to the Selected Medical Practitioner in 2023 was a reconsideration or a fresh referral under the statutory scheme
- 3 Whether the Selected Medical Practitioner was required to issue a fresh report identifying new medical conditions
Ratio Decidendi
It was necessary for Dr Cheng to issue a fresh report under paragraph 3(4) of Schedule 1 to the Police Pensions Regulations 2015, as a new medical condition (alcohol dependence) was identified in 2023 that was not present in the 2019 report. The absence of such a report meant the claimant's right of appeal had not arisen, and the court declared that a fresh report must be issued, after which the right of appeal will be available.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part (judicial review succeeds on Ground 2, fails on Ground 1)
Orders
- Declaration that it is necessary for Dr Cheng to issue a fresh report including the additional diagnosis of alcohol dependence
- Declaration that the right of appeal to the appeal board arises following receipt of that fresh report
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment