Standard Life Assurance Ltd v Oak Dedicated Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 222 (Comm) (13 February 2008)
The policy, properly construed, permits aggregation of claims by different claimants arising from a single originating cause or source, and the excess of £25 million does not apply per claimant but per aggregated claim. The words 'and/or claimant' in the schedule do not override the aggregation provisions in the definitions. The Part VII transfer under FSMA 2000 was effective to vest rights of action in the claimant. Aon was negligent in failing to ensure the policy wording clearly met the client's requirements, but causation and quantum are reserved for Stage 2.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 222 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant/part 20 Claimant: Standard Life Assurance Limited; Defendants: Oak Dedicated Limited and others; Part 20 Defendant: Aon Limited (formerly Aon Group Limited); Part 20 Defendant: Reynolds Porter Chamberlain (a firm); Defendants: Insurer Defendants
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Trial (conjoined Actions) / Stage 1 Trial on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant on Stage 1 issues
- Legal Topics
- Policy Construction, Aggregation of Claims, Professional Indemnity Insurance, Broker Negligence, Excess Clause Interpretation, Transfer of Rights Under FSMA 2000
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Life Assurance Limited
Claimant/part 20 Claimant
Oak Dedicated Limited and others
Defendants
Aon Limited (formerly Aon Group Limited)
Part 20 Defendant
Reynolds Porter Chamberlain (a firm)
Part 20 Defendant
Insurer Defendants
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Trial (conjoined Actions) / Stage 1 Trial on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the policy permits aggregation of claims by different claimants arising from a single originating cause or source
- 2 Whether the excess of £25 million applies per claim or per claimant
- 3 Whether the Part VII transfer under FSMA 2000 vested rights of action in the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The policy, properly construed, permits aggregation of claims by different claimants arising from a single originating cause or source, and the excess of £25 million does not apply per claimant but per aggregated claim. The words 'and/or claimant' in the schedule do not override the aggregation provisions in the definitions. The Part VII transfer under FSMA 2000 was effective to vest rights of action in the claimant. Aon was negligent in failing to ensure the policy wording clearly met the client's requirements, but causation and quantum are reserved for Stage 2.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant on Stage 1 issues
Orders
- Declaration that the policy permits aggregation of claims by different claimants arising from a single originating cause or source
- Declaration that the excess applies per aggregated claim, not per claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment