North British Housing Association Ltd. v Matthews
The court has no general power to adjourn possession proceedings under Ground 8 of the Housing Act 1988 for the purpose of allowing tenants to pay arrears and defeat the claim, except in truly exceptional circumstances. Maladministration by housing benefit authorities is not, of itself, an exceptional circumstance. Once the court is satisfied that the landlord is entitled to possession, no adjournment is permissible.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: North British Housing Association Limited; Defendant/appellant: Lorraine Matthews; Defendant/appellant: Michael Snaith; Defendant/appellant: Laila Masood; Claimant/respondent: London and Quadrant Housing Limited; Defendant/appellant: Lee Morgan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Possession Proceedings, Adjournment of Hearings, Housing Benefit, Ground 8 Housing Act 1988, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North British Housing Association Limited
Claimant/respondent
Lorraine Matthews
Defendant/appellant
Michael Snaith
Defendant/appellant
Laila Masood
Defendant/appellant
London and Quadrant Housing Limited
Claimant/respondent
Lee Morgan
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has power to adjourn possession proceedings under Ground 8 of the Housing Act 1988 to allow tenants to pay arrears and defeat the claim
- 2 In what circumstances, if any, such adjournment is permissible
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no general power to adjourn possession proceedings under Ground 8 of the Housing Act 1988 for the purpose of allowing tenants to pay arrears and defeat the claim, except in truly exceptional circumstances. Maladministration by housing benefit authorities is not, of itself, an exceptional circumstance. Once the court is satisfied that the landlord is entitled to possession, no adjournment is permissible.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeals by all four appellants dismissed
- No adjournment granted in any case
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment