Ford v Mulder [2001] EWCA Civ 1419 (24 August 2001)
The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a High Court Judge's refusal of permission to appeal from a County Court judge. There was no beneficial interest established by Mr Mulder, and there were no grounds to appeal the costs order.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1419
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Helen Dorothy Ford; Defendant/applicant: Gerrit Mulder
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application to Reinstate Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Possession Proceedings, Beneficial Interest, Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Helen Dorothy Ford
Claimant/respondent
Gerrit Mulder
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Reinstate Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant had a beneficial interest in the property
- 2 Whether the claim should have proceeded under the Family Law Act 1996 or under Order 24
- 3 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a High Court refusal of permission to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a High Court Judge's refusal of permission to appeal from a County Court judge. There was no beneficial interest established by Mr Mulder, and there were no grounds to appeal the costs order.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application to reinstate permission to appeal dismissed
- Permission to appeal against costs order refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment