London Borough Of Lewisham v Tolabi & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 1631 (25 October 2001)
Permission to appeal against the costs order is refused because the only way to challenge the costs order would be to go into the merits of the possession order, which Parliament has expressly forbidden under section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1631
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: London Borough of Lewisham; Defendant/applicant: Mr Christopher Tolabi; Defendant/applicant: Miss Dupe Tolabi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Possession Proceedings, Appeals, Costs Orders, Permission to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London Borough of Lewisham
Claimant/respondent
Mr Christopher Tolabi
Defendant/applicant
Miss Dupe Tolabi
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal against a costs order should be granted when permission to appeal the substantive possession order has been refused
- 2 Whether there is a right of appeal to the Court of Appeal in possession proceedings under section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal against the costs order is refused because the only way to challenge the costs order would be to go into the merits of the possession order, which Parliament has expressly forbidden under section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment