Swansea City & County Director Of Housing/Finance v Oben [2002] EWCA Civ 1339 (3 July 2002)
The arrangement to pay arrears was not a new tenancy contract but an agreement to discharge a judgment debt; no point of principle or practice was raised to justify a second appeal; the judge's exercise of discretion was not erroneous.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1339
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Director of Housing/Finance, City and County of Swansea; Defendant/applicant: Jacob Mbu Oben
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Possession Proceedings, Suspension of Possession Orders, Enforcement of Judgments, Discretion of the Court, Contractual Arrangements Post Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Housing/Finance, City and County of Swansea
Claimant/respondent
Jacob Mbu Oben
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an arrangement to pay arrears post-judgment constitutes a new tenancy contract
- 2 Whether the court should grant permission for a second appeal on a point of principle or practice
- 3 Whether the judge erred in exercising discretion to refuse suspension of possession
Ratio Decidendi
The arrangement to pay arrears was not a new tenancy contract but an agreement to discharge a judgment debt; no point of principle or practice was raised to justify a second appeal; the judge's exercise of discretion was not erroneous.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment