London Borough of Croydon v Wright [2007] EWHC 3465 (QB) (06 December 2007)

The refusal to adjourn and refusal to grant interim injunction were flawed due to errors in legal reasoning regarding disability evidence, relevant delay period, and jurisdiction; the matter should be reconsidered by a different judge with fuller evidence.

Citation: [2007] EWHC 3465
Parties: Claimant/respondent: London Borough of Croydon; Defendant/appellant: Doreen Wright
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 06 December 2007
Procedural Posture: Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From County Court Decisions
Outcome: Appeal allowed
Legal Topics: Possession Proceedings, Disability Discrimination Act, Adjournment, Interim Injunction, Jurisdiction Under Housing Act

Housing Law Disability Discrimination Possession Proceedings Disability Discrimination Act Adjournment Interim Injunction Jurisdiction Under Housing Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

London Borough of Croydon

Claimant/respondent

Doreen Wright

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From County Court Decisions

Legal Issues

1 Whether the court had jurisdiction to grant relief sought despite s.89 Housing Act 1980
2 Whether the appellant's disability was relevant to enforcement of possession order
3 Whether refusal to adjourn and refusal to grant injunction were legally flawed

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

Matter remitted to county court for reconsideration by a different judge
Renewed application for permission to appeal from District Judge to be considered afresh