Bedfordshire County Council v Taylor & Ors
Permission to appeal is granted on the new ground (3) only, as Doherty may arguably add a gloss to Kay regarding consideration of personal circumstances in proportionality assessments, but no encouragement is given as to the likelihood of success.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Bedfordshire County Council; Applicant/defendant: Paul Taylor; Applicant/defendant: Russell Atkin; Applicant/defendant: Carl Birch; Applicant/defendant: David Lynch
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal Application
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted on ground 3 only; refused on grounds 1 and 2.
- Legal Topics
- Possession Proceedings, Article 8 ECHR, Trespass, Proportionality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bedfordshire County Council
Respondent/claimant
Paul Taylor
Applicant/defendant
Russell Atkin
Applicant/defendant
Carl Birch
Applicant/defendant
David Lynch
Applicant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the House of Lords decision in Doherty v Birmingham County Council changes the law relevant to possession proceedings involving trespassers and Article 8 ECHR rights
- 2 Whether the appellants should be granted permission to appeal on the basis of a new ground relating to proportionality and personal circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted on the new ground (3) only, as Doherty may arguably add a gloss to Kay regarding consideration of personal circumstances in proportionality assessments, but no encouragement is given as to the likelihood of success.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted on ground 3 only; refused on grounds 1 and 2.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted on ground 3 of the amended grounds of appeal.
- Permission refused on grounds 1 and 2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment