Cambridge City Council v Joyce

Cambridge City Council v Joyce

The trial judge's findings of fact and law were supported by the evidence, the exclusion of certain evidence was proper, the possession order and committal for contempt were reasonable and proportionate, and there was no procedural unfairness or error in sentencing. The appeal and application for permission were dismissed.

Parties
Respondent/claimant: Cambridge City Council; Appellant/defendant: Joyce
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 February 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; application for permission refused
Legal Topics
Possession Proceedings, Breach of Injunction, Committal for Contempt, Reasonableness of Possession Order, Appeal Grounds

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cambridge City Council

Respondent/claimant

Joyce

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the findings of fact and law by the trial judge justified the possession order and committal for contempt
  2. 2 Whether the exclusion of evidence or alleged non-disclosure rendered the trial unfair
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed for contempt was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's findings of fact and law were supported by the evidence, the exclusion of certain evidence was proper, the possession order and committal for contempt were reasonable and proportionate, and there was no procedural unfairness or error in sentencing. The appeal and application for permission were dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; application for permission refused

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Application for permission to appeal refused