French & Anor v Savelieva
The deputy adjudicator erred by failing to require and consider a good reason for the delay in seeking expert inspection of evidence, and by not properly accounting for the litigation stress and delay imposed on the claimants; thus, the order for expert inspection was set aside.
- Parties
- Claimants/appellants: French & Another; Defendant/respondent: Savelieva
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Application for Permission to Appeal and the Appeal Itself
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; deputy adjudicator's order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Possessory Title, Disclosure of Evidence, Late Evidence, Litigation Delay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
French & Another
Claimants/appellants
Savelieva
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Application for Permission to Appeal and the Appeal Itself
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deputy adjudicator erred in granting an order for expert inspection of photographs after the close of evidence and submissions
- 2 Whether there was a good reason for the delay in making the application for expert inspection
- 3 Whether the deputy adjudicator failed to consider the impact of litigation stress and delay on the claimants
Ratio Decidendi
The deputy adjudicator erred by failing to require and consider a good reason for the delay in seeking expert inspection of evidence, and by not properly accounting for the litigation stress and delay imposed on the claimants; thus, the order for expert inspection was set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; deputy adjudicator's order set aside.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Deputy adjudicator's order of 27 March 2013 set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment