L v The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 sets an absolute requirement for effective consent to storage and use of gametes in the UK, which is not incompatible with Article 8 ECHR or EU Treaty rights due to the wide margin of appreciation afforded to Parliament; the HFEA possesses discretionary power to permit export and modify licence conditions, but the court cannot declare storage lawful absent such direction or consent, nor can it supply consent or authorise criminal conduct.
- Parties
- Claimant: L; 1st Defendant: The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority; 2nd Defendant: Secretary of State for Health
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Relief refused
- Legal Topics
- Posthumous Use of Gametes, Consent Requirements, Export of Gametes, Statutory Interpretation, Margin of Appreciation, Treaty Rights, Convention Rights, Inherent Jurisdiction, Ethical Issues in Assisted Conception
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L
Claimant
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
1st Defendant
Secretary of State for Health
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether gametes retrieved from a deceased person can be lawfully stored and exported for assisted conception without effective consent under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990
- 2 Whether the statutory prohibition on storage without effective consent is incompatible with Article 8 ECHR and directly applicable EU Treaty rights
- 3 Whether the court has inherent jurisdiction or common law powers to authorise retrieval, storage, or export of gametes absent statutory consent
Ratio Decidendi
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 sets an absolute requirement for effective consent to storage and use of gametes in the UK, which is not incompatible with Article 8 ECHR or EU Treaty rights due to the wide margin of appreciation afforded to Parliament; the HFEA possesses discretionary power to permit export and modify licence conditions, but the court cannot declare storage lawful absent such direction or consent, nor can it supply consent or authorise criminal conduct.
Court Disposition
Relief refused
Orders
- Declaratory relief sought by the Claimant is refused.
- The issue of export of gametes is to be decided by the HFEA as statutory decision maker.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment