London Borough of Hackney v Okoro [2020] EWCA Civ 681 (27 May 2020)
PD 51Z applies to appeals from possession orders brought under CPR Part 55, as such appeals are part of the proceedings initiated under Part 55 and the stay furthers the purpose of protecting court capacity and public health during the pandemic.
- Citation
- [2020] EWCA Civ 681
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: London Borough of Hackney; Defendant/appellant: Kevin Okoro
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Possession Order / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Practice Direction 51 Z, Stay of Possession Proceedings, Appeals Under CPR Part 55, COVID 19 Protocol
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London Borough of Hackney
Claimant/respondent
Kevin Okoro
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Possession Order / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Practice Direction 51Z stay appeals from possession orders brought under CPR Part 55?
- 2 Are appeals governed by CPR Part 52 excluded from the stay imposed by PD 51Z?
Ratio Decidendi
PD 51Z applies to appeals from possession orders brought under CPR Part 55, as such appeals are part of the proceedings initiated under Part 55 and the stay furthers the purpose of protecting court capacity and public health during the pandemic.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The stay imposed by PD 51Z applies to Mr Okoro's appeal from the possession order.
- The claim, including the appeal, is returned to the County Court for further consideration after the termination of the stay.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment