Aldersgate Estates Ltd v HAM Construction Ltd
The application for a preliminary issue was dismissed due to late timing, lack of agreement, risk of delay and increased costs, absence of agreed facts, and no measurable prospect of settlement. The preliminary issue would not resolve the whole case or save hearing time.
- Parties
- Claimant: Aldersgate Estates Limited; First Defendant: Ham Construction Limited (in liquidation); Second Defendant: Robinson Consulting Limited (in administration)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Application for Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Preliminary Issues, Duty of Care, Remoteness of Damages, Quantum of Damages, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aldersgate Estates Limited
Claimant
Ham Construction Limited (in liquidation)
First Defendant
Robinson Consulting Limited (in administration)
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application for Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim for damages for diminution in market value falls within the scope of the Second Defendant’s duty of care
- 2 Whether the alleged losses are too remote
- 3 Whether a preliminary issue should be ordered at this stage
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a preliminary issue was dismissed due to late timing, lack of agreement, risk of delay and increased costs, absence of agreed facts, and no measurable prospect of settlement. The preliminary issue would not resolve the whole case or save hearing time.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Robinson to pay two thirds of Aldersgate’s costs of the application, summarily assessed at £9,000, payable within 14 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment