Reichmann & Anor v Gauntlett & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 967 (20 June 2006)
The appeal was adjourned to ensure the important legal issue is fully argued, including the appointment of an advocate to the court if necessary.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 967
- Parties
- Claimants/respondents: Reichmann & Anr; Defendants/appellants: Gauntlett & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on a Point of Law; Appeal Adjourned for Further Argument
- Outcome
- Appeal adjourned
- Legal Topics
- Preliminary Points of Law, Adjournment, Advocate to the Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Reichmann & Anr
Claimants/respondents
Gauntlett & Anr
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on a Point of Law; Appeal Adjourned for Further Argument
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the legal question before the court admits of a general or qualified answer
- 2 Whether the matter should proceed in the absence of full argument from both parties
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was adjourned to ensure the important legal issue is fully argued, including the appointment of an advocate to the court if necessary.
Court Disposition
Appeal adjourned
Orders
- Appeal adjourned for further argument
- Advocate to the court to be appointed through the Attorney General
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment