Gordon-Jones, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Justice & Ano
The inclusion of books within the Incentives and Earned Privileges Scheme (IEP) under PSI 30/2013 is unlawful because it imposes severe and unjustified restrictions on prisoners' ability to possess and receive books, contrary to the stated rehabilitative purpose and ministerial intention. Access through the library is not a sufficient substitute for personal possession, and the policy's effect undermines its lawful objectives. The restrictions go beyond what is required for security, volumetric control, or reasonable parcel limits.
- Parties
- Claimant: Barbara Gordon-Jones; First Defendant: The Secretary of State for Justice; Second Defendant: The Governor of HM Prison Send
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; PSI 30/2013 is unlawful insofar as it includes books within the IEP scheme.
- Legal Topics
- Prisoner Rights, Access to Books, Incentives and Earned Privileges Scheme (iep), Policy Lawfulness, Discretionary Powers, Equality Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barbara Gordon-Jones
Claimant
The Secretary of State for Justice
First Defendant
The Governor of HM Prison Send
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the inclusion of books in the Incentives and Earned Privileges Scheme (IEP) under PSI 30/2013 is lawful
- 2 Whether the restrictions on prisoners receiving and possessing books are justified and proportionate
- 3 Whether the policy unlawfully fetters the discretion of prison governors
Ratio Decidendi
The inclusion of books within the Incentives and Earned Privileges Scheme (IEP) under PSI 30/2013 is unlawful because it imposes severe and unjustified restrictions on prisoners' ability to possess and receive books, contrary to the stated rehabilitative purpose and ministerial intention. Access through the library is not a sufficient substitute for personal possession, and the policy's effect undermines its lawful objectives. The restrictions go beyond what is required for security, volumetric control, or reasonable parcel limits.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; PSI 30/2013 is unlawful insofar as it includes books within the IEP scheme.
Orders
- Books must be removed from the list of items treated as privileges under the IEP scheme.
- Books must be excluded from the items that cannot be sent or brought in, subject to volumetric and security controls.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment