Coogan v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 48 (01 February 2012)
Section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 applies to claims for breach of confidence and misuse of private information, treating confidential commercial and personal information as 'intellectual property', thereby removing privilege against self-incrimination; section 72 is not incompatible with Article 6 ECHR as it contains safeguards against use of compelled evidence in criminal proceedings.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 48
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Stephen John Coogan; Claimant/respondent: Nicola Phillips; First Defendant: News Group Newspapers Limited; Second Defendant/appellant: Glenn Michael Mulcaire
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Privilege Against Self Incrimination, Breach of Confidence, Misuse of Private Information, Interpretation of Section 72 Senior Courts Act 1981
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen John Coogan
Claimant/respondent
Nicola Phillips
Claimant/respondent
News Group Newspapers Limited
First Defendant
Glenn Michael Mulcaire
Second Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 remove privilege against self-incrimination in claims for breach of confidence and misuse of private information?
- 2 Is intercepted voicemail 'intellectual property' under section 72(5)?
- 3 Is section 72 incompatible with Article 6 ECHR?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 applies to claims for breach of confidence and misuse of private information, treating confidential commercial and personal information as 'intellectual property', thereby removing privilege against self-incrimination; section 72 is not incompatible with Article 6 ECHR as it contains safeguards against use of compelled evidence in criminal proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Disclosure orders against Mr Mulcaire upheld
- Mr Mulcaire required to provide information as ordered by Mann J and Vos J
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment