JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 1124 (27 October 2009)
Section 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is a 'related offence' under s.13(4) of the Fraud Act 2006 because the conduct it criminalises necessarily involves deception and fraudulent quality, thus removing the privilege against self-incrimination for such offences.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Civ 1124
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: JSC BTA Bank; Defendant/appellant: Ablyazov & Others; Fourth Defendant/appellant: Drey Associates Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Privilege Against Self Incrimination, Fraud Act 2006, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Related Offences, Conspiracy to Defraud
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JSC BTA Bank
Claimant/respondent
Ablyazov & Others
Defendant/appellant
Drey Associates Limited
Fourth Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.13 of the Fraud Act 2006 removes privilege against self-incrimination in respect of an offence under s.328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
- 2 Whether s.328 is a 'related offence' within s.13(4) Fraud Act 2006
Ratio Decidendi
Section 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is a 'related offence' under s.13(4) of the Fraud Act 2006 because the conduct it criminalises necessarily involves deception and fraudulent quality, thus removing the privilege against self-incrimination for such offences.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal of Drey Associates Limited is dismissed.
- Section 328 POCA 2002 is a 'related offence' for the purposes of s.13 Fraud Act 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment