Payne, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2010] EWHC 3528 (Admin) (09 December 2010)

Payne, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2010] EWHC 3528 (Admin) (09 December 2010)

The Inspector's failure to conduct a site visit to the appeal property as required by the procedural rules was a material procedural irregularity that deprived the Claimant of a fair hearing and might have affected the outcome; therefore, the decision must be set aside.

Citation
[2010] EWHC 3528 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: Tanya Payne; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Respondent: Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 December 2010
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; decision quashed
Legal Topics
Procedural Fairness, Site Inspection, Planning Appeals, Natural Justice
Administrative Law Planning Law Procedural Fairness Site Inspection Planning Appeals Natural Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tanya Payne

Claimant

Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

First Respondent

Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Inspector's failure to conduct a site visit as required by the Town and Country Planning (Hearing Procedure) (England) Rules 2000 amounted to procedural unfairness
  2. 2 Whether the procedural irregularity was material to the outcome of the planning appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The Inspector's failure to conduct a site visit to the appeal property as required by the procedural rules was a material procedural irregularity that deprived the Claimant of a fair hearing and might have affected the outcome; therefore, the decision must be set aside.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; decision quashed

Orders

  • The Secretary of State's decision is quashed.
  • Claimant awarded costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.