Rehman v The Bar Standards Board

Rehman v The Bar Standards Board

The disciplinary tribunal acted lawfully and with appropriate caution in refusing adjournment and proceeding in Mr Rehman's absence; no breach of ECHR rights occurred; procedural grounds lacked merit; Mr Rehman persistently issued meritless claims and applications, justifying imposition of an Extended Civil Restraint Order.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: Tariq Rehman; Respondent/defendant: The Bar Standards Board
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal and Judicial Review / Final Judgment and Disposition
Outcome
Appeals and applications dismissed; Extended Civil Restraint Order imposed.
Legal Topics
Professional Misconduct, Adjournment Criteria, Civil Restraint Orders, Human Rights (echr Articles 6 and 9), Regulatory Compliance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tariq Rehman

Appellant/claimant

The Bar Standards Board

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Statutory Appeal and Judicial Review / Final Judgment and Disposition

  1. 1 Whether the disciplinary tribunal erred in refusing adjournment of hearing
  2. 2 Whether procedural irregularities invalidated the findings of professional misconduct
  3. 3 Whether the panel breached ECHR Articles 6 and 9 rights

Ratio Decidendi

The disciplinary tribunal acted lawfully and with appropriate caution in refusing adjournment and proceeding in Mr Rehman's absence; no breach of ECHR rights occurred; procedural grounds lacked merit; Mr Rehman persistently issued meritless claims and applications, justifying imposition of an Extended Civil Restraint Order.

Court Disposition

Appeals and applications dismissed; Extended Civil Restraint Order imposed.

Orders

  • Both applications issued by Mr Rehman on 14 June 2016 dismissed as totally without merit.
  • Statutory appeal in Claim No CO/4920/2014 dismissed.