Mabey and Johnson Ltd. v Ecclesiastical Insurance Office Plc & Ors
There were two separate and distinct contracts for the design, manufacture, and supply of bridges (Ghana I and Ghana II). Each contract gave rise to separate obligations and separate acts of negligence. Therefore, there are two claims for the purposes of the policy indemnity limit.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mabey and Johnson Limited; Defendants: Ecclesiastical Insurance Office Plc and others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Dispute / Judgment After Trial of Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant (Mabey and Johnson Limited) on the preliminary issue
- Legal Topics
- Professional Indemnity Insurance, Interpretation of Insurance Contracts, Aggregation of Claims, Negligence in Design
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mabey and Johnson Limited
Claimant
Ecclesiastical Insurance Office Plc and others
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Dispute / Judgment After Trial of Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is one or two 'claims' under the policy for the Ghana bridges for indemnity calculation purposes
- 2 Whether there were one or two contracts for the design and supply of the Ghana bridges
- 3 Whether there was separate negligence in the design of the Ghana II bridges
Ratio Decidendi
There were two separate and distinct contracts for the design, manufacture, and supply of bridges (Ghana I and Ghana II). Each contract gave rise to separate obligations and separate acts of negligence. Therefore, there are two claims for the purposes of the policy indemnity limit.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant (Mabey and Johnson Limited) on the preliminary issue
Orders
- Declaration that there are two claims under the policy in respect of the Ghana bridges for the purpose of calculating the sums for which the Defendants are obliged to indemnify the Claimant for the policy year beginning 15 March 1996
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment