The Cultural Foundation & Anor v Beazley Furlonge Ltd & Anor
The ASD claim, to the extent arising from defective design of Sector A columns, was not notified in the 2008/09 policy year but was notified in the 2009/10 policy year; claims relating to acoustic works and lack of detail in drawings were notified in 2008/09. Beazley is entitled to set off overpaid defence costs against indemnity owed, but neither claimants nor Beazley can recover such costs from Excess Insurers under the 1930 Act. Post-award interest is not covered by the policies as compensation or damages, but claimants may be entitled to statutory interest under the Senior Courts Act 1981.
- Parties
- First Claimant: The Cultural Foundation (doing business as American School of Dubai); Second Claimant: Abu Dhabi National Exhibitions Company; First Defendant: Beazley Furlonge Limited (as managing agent for Syndicate AFB 2623/623 at Lloyd’s); Third Defendant: Great Lakes Insurance S. E.; Fourth Defendant: MSI Corporate Capital Limited (Syndicate 3210); Fifth Defendant: Aspen Insurance UK Limited; Sixth Defendant: QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Dispute (preliminary Issues) / Judgment on Preliminary Issues After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for claimants and defendants in part; declarations on preliminary issues as set out in the judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Professional Indemnity Insurance, Notification of Circumstances, Policy Period Allocation, Set Off and Restitution, Third Parties (rights Against Insurers) Act 1930, Interest on Awards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Cultural Foundation (doing business as American School of Dubai)
First Claimant
Abu Dhabi National Exhibitions Company
Second Claimant
Beazley Furlonge Limited (as managing agent for Syndicate AFB 2623/623 at Lloyd’s)
First Defendant
Great Lakes Insurance S. E.
Third Defendant
MSI Corporate Capital Limited (Syndicate 3210)
Fourth Defendant
Aspen Insurance UK Limited
Fifth Defendant
QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Dispute (preliminary Issues) / Judgment on Preliminary Issues After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Which policy year(s) cover the ASD claim based on notifications made?
- 2 Whether Beazley can set off overpaid defence costs against indemnity owed to claimants?
- 3 Whether ASD/ADNEC can recover shortfalls from Excess Insurers?
Ratio Decidendi
The ASD claim, to the extent arising from defective design of Sector A columns, was not notified in the 2008/09 policy year but was notified in the 2009/10 policy year; claims relating to acoustic works and lack of detail in drawings were notified in 2008/09. Beazley is entitled to set off overpaid defence costs against indemnity owed, but neither claimants nor Beazley can recover such costs from Excess Insurers under the 1930 Act. Post-award interest is not covered by the policies as compensation or damages, but claimants may be entitled to statutory interest under the Senior Courts Act 1981.
Court Disposition
Judgment for claimants and defendants in part; declarations on preliminary issues as set out in the judgment.
Orders
- ASD claim relating to Sector A columns not covered by 2008/09 policy but covered by 2009/10 policy; claims relating to acoustic works and lack of detail in drawings covered by 2008/09 policy.
- Beazley entitled to set off overpaid defence costs against indemnity owed to claimants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment