The Cultural Foundation & Anor v Beazley Furlonge Ltd & Ors
Costs were apportioned between the parties based on relative success on discrete preliminary issues. ASD and ADNEC were broadly successful on the core Policy Period Issues and awarded the majority of their costs against Beazley, subject to deductions for issues lost. Beazley was awarded a proportion of its costs for Issue 5 against ASD and ADNEC. Excess Insurers were awarded costs on an issue-by-issue basis, reflecting their success or failure on each. Payments on account and interest on costs were ordered in line with standard practice and the parties' submissions.
- Parties
- First Claimant: The Cultural Foundation (doing business as American School of Dubai); Second Claimant: Abu Dhabi National Exhibitions Company; First Defendant: Beazley Furlonge Limited (as managing agent for Syndicate AFB 2623/623 at Lloyd’s); Third Defendant: Great Lakes Insurance S.E.; Fourth Defendant: MSI Corporate Capital Limited (Syndicate 3210); Fifth Defendant: Aspen Insurance UK Limited; Sixth Defendant: QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Dispute (costs Judgment) / Post Trial, Costs Determination After Preliminary Issues Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs apportioned between parties according to success on preliminary issues; payments on account and interest ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Professional Indemnity Insurance, Third Parties (rights Against Insurers) Act 1930, Costs Orders, Issue Based Costs Apportionment, Interest on Costs, Payments on Account
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Cultural Foundation (doing business as American School of Dubai)
First Claimant
Abu Dhabi National Exhibitions Company
Second Claimant
Beazley Furlonge Limited (as managing agent for Syndicate AFB 2623/623 at Lloyd’s)
First Defendant
Great Lakes Insurance S.E.
Third Defendant
MSI Corporate Capital Limited (Syndicate 3210)
Fourth Defendant
Aspen Insurance UK Limited
Fifth Defendant
QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Dispute (costs Judgment) / Post Trial, Costs Determination After Preliminary Issues Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Which party is entitled to costs following the determination of preliminary issues in a professional indemnity insurance dispute?
- 2 How should costs be apportioned between parties based on success or failure on discrete issues?
- 3 Are ASD and ADNEC entitled to recover post-award interest under the policies?
Ratio Decidendi
Costs were apportioned between the parties based on relative success on discrete preliminary issues. ASD and ADNEC were broadly successful on the core Policy Period Issues and awarded the majority of their costs against Beazley, subject to deductions for issues lost. Beazley was awarded a proportion of its costs for Issue 5 against ASD and ADNEC. Excess Insurers were awarded costs on an issue-by-issue basis, reflecting their success or failure on each. Payments on account and interest on costs were ordered in line with standard practice and the parties' submissions.
Court Disposition
Costs apportioned between parties according to success on preliminary issues; payments on account and interest ordered.
Orders
- Beazley to pay ASD 65% of its costs of the preliminary issues, subject to detailed assessment, with an interim payment of £260,000 within 28 days.
- Beazley to pay ADNEC 53.5% of its costs of the preliminary issues, subject to detailed assessment, with an interim payment of £90,000 within 28 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment