White (As Executor And Trustee of the Will of Joseph Robson Deceased) v Matthys & Ors [2014] EWHC 295 (Ch) (31 January 2014)
The deceased was not a permissible donor under the 2000 Act as he was not registered in an electoral register within five years before his death. The BNP received and accepted a donation in breach of section 54 by executing the Deed of Variation. The assignment of rights to the Settlement did not cure the breach....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 295 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Marc White; First Defendant: Jennifer Matthys; Second Defendant: Clive Jefferson; Third Defendant: Patrick Harrington; Fourth Defendant: Jeremy Robson; Fifth Defendant: Simon Robson; Sixth Defendant: The Judge Learned Hand Foundation for Civil and Religious Liberties
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (directions Under CPR R. 64.2(a)) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Residuary estate to be distributed on intestacy to the fourth and fifth defendants; gift to BNP and Settlement fails.
- Legal Topics
- Prohibition of Foreign Donations to Political Parties, Interpretation of Political Parties Elections and Referendums Act 2000, Testamentary Gifts to Political Parties, Intestacy, Assignment of Rights Under a Will
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marc White
Claimant
Jennifer Matthys
First Defendant
Clive Jefferson
Second Defendant
Patrick Harrington
Third Defendant
Jeremy Robson
Fourth Defendant
Simon Robson
Fifth Defendant
The Judge Learned Hand Foundation for Civil and Religious Liberties
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (directions Under CPR R. 64.2(a)) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased was a 'permissible donor' under the Political Parties Elections and Referendums Act 2000
- 2 Whether the BNP received and accepted a donation in breach of section 54 of the 2000 Act
- 3 Whether the Deed of Variation could cure the breach or redirect the gift lawfully
Ratio Decidendi
The deceased was not a permissible donor under the 2000 Act as he was not registered in an electoral register within five years before his death. The BNP received and accepted a donation in breach of section 54 by executing the Deed of Variation. The assignment of rights to the Settlement did not cure the breach. The court cannot direct distribution to the BNP or its assignees, and the residuary estate must pass on intestacy to the fourth and fifth defendants.
Court Disposition
Residuary estate to be distributed on intestacy to the fourth and fifth defendants; gift to BNP and Settlement fails.
Orders
- Direction that the claimant distribute the residuary estate to the fourth and fifth defendants as beneficiaries on intestacy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment