Davies v Davies [2015] EWCA Civ 1008 (11 September 2015)
Permission to appeal is granted in respect of paragraph 6 of the judge's order, as it is arguable the charge should have been limited to the property subject to the claim and not the entirety of Mosewick Farm; extension of time is granted due to exceptional circumstances, but the substantive proprietary estoppel finding stands.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 1008
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Sidney Lyn Davies; Defendant/appellant: Margaret Matilda Davies; Second Defendant: John Anthony Davies
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Permission to Appeal and Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted in respect of paragraph 6 of the judge's order; extension of time granted; stay of enforcement ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Proprietary Estoppel, Equitable Remedies, Charging Orders, Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sidney Lyn Davies
Claimant/respondent
Margaret Matilda Davies
Defendant/appellant
John Anthony Davies
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Permission to Appeal and Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in charging the entirety of Mosewick Farm rather than only the property subject to the claim
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the appellant's notice should be excused
- 3 Whether proprietary estoppel was properly established
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted in respect of paragraph 6 of the judge's order, as it is arguable the charge should have been limited to the property subject to the claim and not the entirety of Mosewick Farm; extension of time is granted due to exceptional circumstances, but the substantive proprietary estoppel finding stands.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted in respect of paragraph 6 of the judge's order; extension of time granted; stay of enforcement ordered.
Orders
- Appellant to file revised grounds of appeal and skeleton within 35 days.
- Stay of enforcement of the order dated 27 September 2013, charging order dated 21 November 2014, order for sale dated 15 December 2014, and warrants for possession until determination of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment