Richard John Winter & Anor v Philip Henry Winter & Anor

Richard John Winter & Anor v Philip Henry Winter & Anor

The trial judge was entitled to find that Richard and Adrian Winter suffered sufficient net detriment by committing their working lives to the family business in reliance on assurances, outweighing the financial benefits received, and the evaluative exercise was properly conducted. The appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Richard John Winter; Claimant/respondent: Adrian Charles Winter; Defendant/appellant: Philip Henry Winter; Defendant/respondent: Clarke Willmott Trust Corporation Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 June 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Proprietary Estoppel, Detrimental Reliance, Family Business Succession, Unconscionability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard John Winter

Claimant/respondent

Adrian Charles Winter

Claimant/respondent

Philip Henry Winter

Defendant/appellant

Clarke Willmott Trust Corporation Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Richard and Adrian Winter suffered sufficient detriment to succeed in a proprietary estoppel claim against Albert Winter's estate
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge properly weighed non-financial disadvantages against financial benefits in assessing detriment

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge was entitled to find that Richard and Adrian Winter suffered sufficient net detriment by committing their working lives to the family business in reliance on assurances, outweighing the financial benefits received, and the evaluative exercise was properly conducted. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The trial judge's order awarding Richard and Adrian Winter a one-third share each of Albert Winter's interests in the Partnership and Company stands.