The Funding Corporation Block Discounting Ltd v Lexi Holdings Plc & Anor
TFC acquired equitable proprietary interests in the proceeds of sale of certain properties by virtue of estoppel, as Lexi and the connected companies were estopped from denying the enforceability of the loan agreements and related security represented to TFC. However, TFC acquired no interest in the Tinsett properties, as there was no evidence of authority or representation binding the property owner. Barclays' security interest under its debenture was not released by the Deed of Release in respect of the right to set aside the property transfers, but the exercise of that right is subject to the protection of TFC's acquired rights under Companies Act 1985 s.322(2)(b). Thus, TFC is...
- Parties
- Claimant: The Funding Corporation Block Discounting Limited; First Defendant: Lexi Holdings Plc (in Administration); Second Defendant: Barclays Bank Plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- TFC's claim to the proceeds of sale of the properties (other than the Tinsett properties) is allowed; Barclays' claim to the proceeds of the Tinsett properties is allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Proprietary Claims, Equitable Charges, Priority of Interests, Fraud, Companies Act 1985 S.320/322, Land Registration Act 2002
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Funding Corporation Block Discounting Limited
Claimant
Lexi Holdings Plc (in Administration)
First Defendant
Barclays Bank Plc
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether TFC acquired proprietary interests in the proceeds of sale of properties formerly owned by Lexi Holdings Plc and subject to fraudulent transactions
- 2 Whether Barclays' security interests under its debenture have priority over TFC's claims
- 3 Effect of the Deed of Release between Barclays and Lexi on the parties' respective claims
Ratio Decidendi
TFC acquired equitable proprietary interests in the proceeds of sale of certain properties by virtue of estoppel, as Lexi and the connected companies were estopped from denying the enforceability of the loan agreements and related security represented to TFC. However, TFC acquired no interest in the Tinsett properties, as there was no evidence of authority or representation binding the property owner. Barclays' security interest under its debenture was not released by the Deed of Release in respect of the right to set aside the property transfers, but the exercise of that right is subject to the protection of TFC's acquired rights under Companies Act 1985 s.322(2)(b). Thus, TFC is...
Court Disposition
TFC's claim to the proceeds of sale of the properties (other than the Tinsett properties) is allowed; Barclays' claim to the proceeds of the Tinsett properties is allowed.
Orders
- TFC is entitled to the proceeds of sale of the properties other than the Tinsett properties.
- Barclays is entitled to the proceeds of sale of the Tinsett properties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment