Eley, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government

Eley, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government

The judge at first instance was entitled to grant a PCO based on the principles in Corner House, as clarified by Compton and Buglife. The test of general public importance is a matter of degree for the first instance judge. The claimant's personal interest did not preclude a PCO. There was no error of principle in the judge's approach, and the case did not warrant appellate intervention.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: The Queen on the Application of Eley; Defendant/applicant: The Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 November 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Protected Costs Orders, Public Interest Litigation, Costs Capping, Planning Law, Disclosure of Evidence
Administrative Law Environmental Law Civil Procedure Protected Costs Orders Public Interest Litigation Costs Capping Planning Law Disclosure of Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen on the Application of Eley

Claimant/respondent

The Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in granting a protective costs order (PCO) in favour of the claimant
  2. 2 Whether the case was of general public importance justifying a PCO
  3. 3 Whether the claimant's personal interest precluded a PCO

Ratio Decidendi

The judge at first instance was entitled to grant a PCO based on the principles in Corner House, as clarified by Compton and Buglife. The test of general public importance is a matter of degree for the first instance judge. The claimant's personal interest did not preclude a PCO. There was no error of principle in the judge's approach, and the case did not warrant appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • Renewed application for permission to appeal refused