QRS v Beach & Anor [2014] EWHC 4189 (QB) (11 December 2014)
The court held that the default judgment and final injunction granted against Rick Kordowski under CPR 12 and 13 are governed by the self-contained regime of CPR 13. Kordowski failed to demonstrate a real prospect of successfully defending the harassment claim or any other good reason to set aside the judgment. His evidence did not sufficiently rebut the inference of involvement and joint tortfeasorship, and he did not act promptly in applying to set aside. The injunction and costs order stand.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 4189 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: QRS; First Defendant: Daniel Charles Beach; Second Defendant: Rick Kordowski
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Harassment Injunction / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment and Final Injunction
- Outcome
- Application to set aside default judgment and final injunction dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Protection From Harassment Act 1997, Default Judgment, Injunctions, Joint Tortfeasorship, Aiding and Abetting, Case Management Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
QRS
Claimant
Daniel Charles Beach
First Defendant
Rick Kordowski
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Harassment Injunction / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment and Final Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the default judgment and final injunction against the second defendant should be set aside under CPR 13.3
- 2 Whether the second defendant has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim
- 3 Whether the second defendant's conduct amounted to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the default judgment and final injunction granted against Rick Kordowski under CPR 12 and 13 are governed by the self-contained regime of CPR 13. Kordowski failed to demonstrate a real prospect of successfully defending the harassment claim or any other good reason to set aside the judgment. His evidence did not sufficiently rebut the inference of involvement and joint tortfeasorship, and he did not act promptly in applying to set aside. The injunction and costs order stand.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside default judgment and final injunction dismissed
Orders
- Final injunction restraining both defendants from harassment stands
- Order for deletion of data by first defendant stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment