The Plantagenet Alliance Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) [2013] EWHC 3164 (Admin) (18 October 2013)
The Court found that the case raised issues of general public importance and public interest, and the Claimant lacked financial means to pursue the litigation without a PCO. The Court applied the Corner House principles flexibly, determined that a full PCO was appropriate, and set a modest cost cap at £70,000 at Treasury rates. Applications for discharge or variation of the PCO, security for costs, and variation of the disclosure order were dismissed. Extension of time for filing Grounds of Resistance was granted.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 3164 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Plantagenet Alliance Limited; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Justice; Second Defendant: University of Leicester; First Interested Party: Members for the Time Being of the Chapter, the Council and the College of Canons of the Cathedral of Saint Martin Leicester; Second Interested Party: Members for the Time Being of the Chapter, the Council and the College of Canons of the Cathedral and Metropolitan Church of Saint Peter York
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Interlocutory Hearing on Costs and Procedural Applications
- Outcome
- Applications for discharge or variation of PCO, security for costs, and variation of disclosure order dismissed; cost cap set; extension of time granted.
- Legal Topics
- Protective Costs Orders, Security for Costs, Disclosure, Judicial Review, Burial Act 1857, Cost Capping
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Plantagenet Alliance Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Justice
First Defendant
University of Leicester
Second Defendant
Members for the Time Being of the Chapter, the Council and the College of Canons of the Cathedral of Saint Martin Leicester
First Interested Party
Members for the Time Being of the Chapter, the Council and the College of Canons of the Cathedral and Metropolitan Church of Saint Peter York
Second Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Interlocutory Hearing on Costs and Procedural Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Protective Costs Order (PCO) should be discharged or varied
- 2 Whether security for costs should be ordered against the Claimant
- 3 Appropriate quantum for cost cap under PCO
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the case raised issues of general public importance and public interest, and the Claimant lacked financial means to pursue the litigation without a PCO. The Court applied the Corner House principles flexibly, determined that a full PCO was appropriate, and set a modest cost cap at £70,000 at Treasury rates. Applications for discharge or variation of the PCO, security for costs, and variation of the disclosure order were dismissed. Extension of time for filing Grounds of Resistance was granted.
Court Disposition
Applications for discharge or variation of PCO, security for costs, and variation of disclosure order dismissed; cost cap set; extension of time granted.
Orders
- Full Protective Costs Order maintained in favour of Claimant against First and Second Defendants
- Cost cap set at £70,000 at Treasury rates
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment