Midland Mainline Ltd & Ors v Eagle Star Insurance Company Ltd

Midland Mainline Ltd & Ors v Eagle Star Insurance Company Ltd

Wear and tear (rolling contact fatigue) was a proximate cause of the claimants’ losses, either solely or jointly with the ESRs. The general exclusion for wear and tear therefore applied to the denial of access extension, and the claimants were not entitled to indemnity under the policy.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Midland Mainline Limited; Claimant/respondent: Central Trains Limited; Claimant/respondent: Gatwick Express Railway Company Limited; Claimant/respondent: Scotrail Railways Limited; Claimant/respondent: Silverlink Train Services Limited; Defendant/appellant: Eagle Star Insurance Company Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 July 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Proximate Cause, Policy Exclusions, Business Interruption Insurance, Denial of Access Extension
Insurance Law Contract Law Proximate Cause Policy Exclusions Business Interruption Insurance Denial of Access Extension

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Midland Mainline Limited

Claimant/respondent

Central Trains Limited

Claimant/respondent

Gatwick Express Railway Company Limited

Claimant/respondent

Scotrail Railways Limited

Claimant/respondent

Silverlink Train Services Limited

Claimant/respondent

Eagle Star Insurance Company Limited

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether wear and tear was a proximate cause of the claimants’ losses under the insurance policy
  2. 2 Whether the general exclusion for wear and tear applied to the denial of access extension

Ratio Decidendi

Wear and tear (rolling contact fatigue) was a proximate cause of the claimants’ losses, either solely or jointly with the ESRs. The general exclusion for wear and tear therefore applied to the denial of access extension, and the claimants were not entitled to indemnity under the policy.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Eagle Star’s appeal is allowed; the claimants are not entitled to indemnity under the policy.