Riley v Sivier [2023] EWCA Civ 71 (01 February 2023)
The judge's findings on the reasonableness of Mr Sivier's belief were within the range reasonably open to her; no arguable error of law or fact was established; editorial judgment was irrelevant given the absence of reasonable grounds; no procedural irregularity occurred.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Civ 71
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Rachel Riley; Defendant/appellant: Michael Sivier
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Defence, Serious Harm, Editorial Judgment, Procedural Irregularity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rachel Riley
Claimant/respondent
Michael Sivier
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Libel Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge failed to consider all circumstances under s 4(2) Defamation Act 2013
- 2 Whether allowance for editorial judgment was properly made under s 4(4) Defamation Act 2013
- 3 Whether there was a serious procedural irregularity in the judge's findings
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's findings on the reasonableness of Mr Sivier's belief were within the range reasonably open to her; no arguable error of law or fact was established; editorial judgment was irrelevant given the absence of reasonable grounds; no procedural irregularity occurred.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Stay of execution on costs and damages lifted
- No retrial ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment