Robson, R (on the application of) v Salford City Council [2015] EWCA Civ 6 (20 January 2015)
The Council's decision to close the Passenger Transport Unit was a high-level policy decision, lawfully made based on individual transport assessments and a thorough consultation process; there was no legal requirement for full community care reassessments prior to closure, and the Council complied with its public sector equality duty by gathering and analysing sufficient information regarding the impact on disabled users.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 6
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Michael Robson (by his mother and litigation friend Mary Robson); Claimant/appellant: Jennifer Barrett (by her mother and litigation friend Elaine Barrett); Defendant/respondent: Salford City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Sector Equality Duty, Consultation Requirements, Community Care Assessments, Provision of Transport for Disabled Adults
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Robson (by his mother and litigation friend Mary Robson)
Claimant/appellant
Jennifer Barrett (by her mother and litigation friend Elaine Barrett)
Claimant/appellant
Salford City Council
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Salford City Council acted unlawfully by failing to undertake full individual community care assessments before closing the Passenger Transport Unit
- 2 Whether the consultation carried out prior to the decision was lawful
- 3 Whether the Council complied with the public sector equality duty under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010
Ratio Decidendi
The Council's decision to close the Passenger Transport Unit was a high-level policy decision, lawfully made based on individual transport assessments and a thorough consultation process; there was no legal requirement for full community care reassessments prior to closure, and the Council complied with its public sector equality duty by gathering and analysing sufficient information regarding the impact on disabled users.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment