Sivier v Riley
The judge erred in striking out the public interest defence by relying on the failure of the truth defence and by assessing reasonableness with reference to facts not pleaded or known to the defendant at publication. The defence as pleaded was imperfect but not so deficient as to justify summary striking out. The public interest defence should proceed to trial for proper assessment.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Michael Sivier; Respondent/claimant: Rachel Riley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Striking Out Defence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Defence, Striking Out Pleadings, Reasonable Belief, Defamation Act 2013, Editorial Judgement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Sivier
Appellant/defendant
Rachel Riley
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Striking Out Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the public interest defence under s 4 Defamation Act 2013 was properly struck out
- 2 Whether the defence disclosed a reasonable basis for belief that publication was in the public interest
- 3 Whether the judge erred in treating the failure of the truth defence as dispositive of the public interest defence
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred in striking out the public interest defence by relying on the failure of the truth defence and by assessing reasonableness with reference to facts not pleaded or known to the defendant at publication. The defence as pleaded was imperfect but not so deficient as to justify summary striking out. The public interest defence should proceed to trial for proper assessment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order striking out the public interest defence set aside
- Ms Riley's application to strike out the public interest defence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment