Devine & Anor v Welsh Ministers
The inspector's decision was coherent and internally consistent, with clear findings of fact regarding the absence of fencing impeding access during the relevant period and a reasonable decision to give no weight to the 1987 Community Council map; thus, there was no proper basis for quashing the inspector's order.
- Parties
- Respondents: Devine & Anr; Appellants: Welsh Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Cardiff Civil Justice Centre
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; inspector's decision reinstated.
- Legal Topics
- Public Rights of Way, Dedication of Highways, Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions, Evidentiary Standards in Public Inquiries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Devine & Anr
Respondents
Welsh Ministers
Appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Cardiff Civil Justice Centre
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the inspector erred in law in his findings regarding the existence and effect of fencing on the Order route during the relevant period for presumed dedication of a public footpath
- 2 Whether the inspector unreasonably failed to take account of a 1987 map produced by Llantrisant Community Council
Ratio Decidendi
The inspector's decision was coherent and internally consistent, with clear findings of fact regarding the absence of fencing impeding access during the relevant period and a reasonable decision to give no weight to the 1987 Community Council map; thus, there was no proper basis for quashing the inspector's order.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; inspector's decision reinstated.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The inspector's order confirming the addition of the footpath to the definitive map is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment