Nathaniel Birley & Anor v Heritage Independent Living Ltd
Claimants' conduct did not amount to abuse of process; claim was properly characterized as personal injury; QOCS applied; recovery of CFA success fee and ATE premium was permissible prior to April 2019 in media claims; costs order below was within judge's discretion.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Nathaniel Birley; Claimant/respondent: Virginier Bell; Defendant/appellant: Heritage Independent Living Ltd; Additional Party: Angel Risk Management; Additional Party: AXA XL Insurance Company UK Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Qualified One Way Costs Shifting (qocs), Conditional Fee Agreements (cfa), After the Event (ate) Insurance, Abuse of Process, Strike Out, Costs Orders, Pre Action Protocols
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nathaniel Birley
Claimant/respondent
Virginier Bell
Claimant/respondent
Heritage Independent Living Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Angel Risk Management
Additional Party
AXA XL Insurance Company UK Ltd
Additional Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether QOCS applies to personal injury claims involving media causes of action
- 2 Whether claimants' conduct amounted to abuse of process justifying strike out
- 3 Whether recovery of CFA success fee and ATE premium can coincide with QOCS protection
Ratio Decidendi
Claimants' conduct did not amount to abuse of process; claim was properly characterized as personal injury; QOCS applied; recovery of CFA success fee and ATE premium was permissible prior to April 2019 in media claims; costs order below was within judge's discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Insurers (Angel Risk Management and AXA XL Insurance Company UK Ltd) joined as parties under CPR r19.2(2)(b)
- Costs order below upheld; QOCS applies
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment