Clift v Slough Borough Council & Anor [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB) (06 July 2009)
Qualified privilege applies only to publication to customer-facing staff and managers in certain departments; excessive publication to other departments and partner organisations not protected; Council's duty to protect staff does not justify wide circulation; Article 8 ECHR and Data Protection Act require necessity and proportionality; claimant's reputation was unjustifiably interfered with by excessive publication.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Jane Clift; First Defendant: Slough Borough Council; Second Defendant: Patrick Kelleher
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Action / Ruling on Qualified Privilege and Related Issues, Post Jury Argument
- Outcome
- Qualified privilege defence allowed in part; denied in part; issues of malice and damages to be determined by jury.
- Legal Topics
- Qualified Privilege, Article 8 ECHR, Data Protection Act 1998, Malice, Justification, Health and Safety at Work, Publication of Sensitive Personal Data
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Clift
Claimant
Slough Borough Council
First Defendant
Patrick Kelleher
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Ruling on Qualified Privilege and Related Issues, Post Jury Argument
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether publication of claimant's inclusion on Violent Persons Register was protected by qualified privilege
- 2 Whether publication breached claimant's Article 8 ECHR rights
- 3 Whether publication complied with Data Protection Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
Qualified privilege applies only to publication to customer-facing staff and managers in certain departments; excessive publication to other departments and partner organisations not protected; Council's duty to protect staff does not justify wide circulation; Article 8 ECHR and Data Protection Act require necessity and proportionality; claimant's reputation was unjustifiably interfered with by excessive publication.
Court Disposition
Qualified privilege defence allowed in part; denied in part; issues of malice and damages to be determined by jury.
Orders
- Qualified privilege applies to publication to customer-facing staff and managers in Trading Standards, Neighbourhood Enforcement, Community Safety.
- Qualified privilege does not apply to publication to other departments, community wardens, trade union officials, partner organisations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment