Clift v Slough Borough Council & Anor [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB) (06 July 2009)

Clift v Slough Borough Council & Anor [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB) (06 July 2009)

Qualified privilege applies only to publication to customer-facing staff and managers in certain departments; excessive publication to other departments and partner organisations not protected; Council's duty to protect staff does not justify wide circulation; Article 8 ECHR and Data Protection Act require necessity and proportionality; claimant's reputation was unjustifiably interfered with by excessive publication.

Citation
[2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Jane Clift; First Defendant: Slough Borough Council; Second Defendant: Patrick Kelleher
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Ruling on Qualified Privilege and Related Issues, Post Jury Argument
Outcome
Qualified privilege defence allowed in part; denied in part; issues of malice and damages to be determined by jury.
Legal Topics
Qualified Privilege, Article 8 ECHR, Data Protection Act 1998, Malice, Justification, Health and Safety at Work, Publication of Sensitive Personal Data

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Clift

Claimant

Slough Borough Council

First Defendant

Patrick Kelleher

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Action / Ruling on Qualified Privilege and Related Issues, Post Jury Argument

  1. 1 Whether publication of claimant's inclusion on Violent Persons Register was protected by qualified privilege
  2. 2 Whether publication breached claimant's Article 8 ECHR rights
  3. 3 Whether publication complied with Data Protection Act 1998

Ratio Decidendi

Qualified privilege applies only to publication to customer-facing staff and managers in certain departments; excessive publication to other departments and partner organisations not protected; Council's duty to protect staff does not justify wide circulation; Article 8 ECHR and Data Protection Act require necessity and proportionality; claimant's reputation was unjustifiably interfered with by excessive publication.

Court Disposition

Qualified privilege defence allowed in part; denied in part; issues of malice and damages to be determined by jury.

Orders

  • Qualified privilege applies to publication to customer-facing staff and managers in Trading Standards, Neighbourhood Enforcement, Community Safety.
  • Qualified privilege does not apply to publication to other departments, community wardens, trade union officials, partner organisations.