Ludlow v National Power Plc [2000] EWCA Civ 289 (17 November 2000)

Ludlow v National Power Plc [2000] EWCA Civ 289 (17 November 2000)

The trial judge was entitled to prefer the evidence of the defendant's expert, Dr Cutting, over that of Dr Alun Jones, and to conclude that the accident was not the cause of the claimant's current psychiatric condition. The reasons given, though terse, were sufficient and understandable to the parties. The appeal is dismissed.

Citation
[2000] EWCA Civ 289
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Mr Ludlow; Defendant/respondent: National Power PLC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 November 2000
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal Against Quantum of Damages
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Quantum of Damages, Causation, Psychiatric Injury, Expert Evidence, Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Ludlow

Claimant/appellant

National Power PLC

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal Against Quantum of Damages

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in rejecting the psychiatric element (PTSD) of the claimant's injury claim
  2. 2 Whether the judge gave adequate reasons for preferring one expert's evidence over another
  3. 3 Whether the claimant's current psychiatric condition was caused by the accident

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge was entitled to prefer the evidence of the defendant's expert, Dr Cutting, over that of Dr Alun Jones, and to conclude that the accident was not the cause of the claimant's current psychiatric condition. The reasons given, though terse, were sufficient and understandable to the parties. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Stay on execution of judgment lifted