Siddiq v Kings College London [2001] EWCA Civ 159 (6 February 2001)
The claim was time-barred as it was brought more than six months after the last act complained of. The court's discretion to extend time was properly exercised against the applicant, and no important point of principle or compelling reason was raised to justify permission for a second appeal.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 159
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Mehjabeen Siddiq; Defendant/respondent: Kings College, London
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Post County Court Appeal
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Limitation Periods, Extension of Time, Human Rights Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mehjabeen Siddiq
Claimant/applicant
Kings College, London
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Post County Court Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim for race and sex discrimination was brought within statutory time limits
- 2 Whether discretion should be exercised to extend time for bringing the claim
- 3 Whether the proposed appeal raises an important point of principle or practice
Ratio Decidendi
The claim was time-barred as it was brought more than six months after the last act complained of. The court's discretion to extend time was properly exercised against the applicant, and no important point of principle or compelling reason was raised to justify permission for a second appeal.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Application for adjournment refused
- Application for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment