Kalu v London Borough Of Hackney [2002] EWCA Civ 139 (5 February 2002)

Kalu v London Borough Of Hackney [2002] EWCA Civ 139 (5 February 2002)

No arguable point of law was identified in the applicant's grounds. The Employment Tribunal gave detailed and reasoned consideration to the evidence, and there was no basis to argue that their findings were unfairly reached or tainted by corruption.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 139
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Anthony Kalu; Defendants/respondents: London Borough of Hackney and Others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 February 2002
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Outcome
Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Victimisation, Unauthorised Wage Deductions, TUPE Regulations, Right to Fair Trial
Employment Law Discrimination Law Race Discrimination Sex Discrimination Victimisation Unauthorised Wage Deductions TUPE Regulations Right to Fair Trial

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Kalu

Claimant/applicant

London Borough of Hackney and Others

Defendants/respondents

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in dismissing claims of discrimination, victimisation, and unauthorised deductions from wages
  2. 2 Whether there was a breach of TUPE regulations
  3. 3 Whether there was a denial of a fair trial or presence of corruption

Ratio Decidendi

No arguable point of law was identified in the applicant's grounds. The Employment Tribunal gave detailed and reasoned consideration to the evidence, and there was no basis to argue that their findings were unfairly reached or tainted by corruption.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Application for permission to appeal refused