Kularatne v Horizon NHS Trust [2002] EWCA Civ 532 (10 April 2002)

Kularatne v Horizon NHS Trust [2002] EWCA Civ 532 (10 April 2002)

The applicant failed to demonstrate that the Employment Tribunal's reasoning was legally inadequate or that any failure to address specific factual points amounted to an error of law. The Tribunal's decision was sufficiently reasoned and there was no real prospect of success on appeal.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 532
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Kausila Devi Kularatne; Defendant/respondent: Horizon NHS Trust
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 April 2002
Procedural Posture
Employment Discrimination Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Outcome
Permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Employment Tribunal Procedure, Adequacy of Reasons, Burden of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kausila Devi Kularatne

Claimant/applicant

Horizon NHS Trust

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Discrimination Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to provide adequate reasons for its decision rejecting race discrimination claim
  2. 2 Whether failure to address certain factual points amounted to an error of law

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to demonstrate that the Employment Tribunal's reasoning was legally inadequate or that any failure to address specific factual points amounted to an error of law. The Tribunal's decision was sufficiently reasoned and there was no real prospect of success on appeal.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Application for permission to appeal dismissed