Goldtrail Travel Ltd v Aydin & Ors

Goldtrail Travel Ltd v Aydin & Ors

The application to re-open the appeal is dismissed because there is no real injustice, no exceptional circumstances, and no undermining of the integrity of the litigation process. The alleged errors and unfairness are either incorrect, insubstantial, or do not affect the outcome.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Goldtrail Travel Limited (in liquidation); Defendant/appellant: Abdulkadir Aydin; Defendant/appellant: Black Pearl Investments Limited; Defendant/appellant: Onur Air Tasimaclik AS; Defendant/appellant: Magnus Stephensen; Defendant/appellant: Halldor Sigurdarson; Defendant/appellant: Philip Wyatt
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Re Open Appeal Under CPR Part 52.17
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Re Opening Appeals, Fair Trial, Judicial Conduct
Civil Procedure Re Opening Appeals Fair Trial Judicial Conduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Goldtrail Travel Limited (in liquidation)

Claimant/respondent

Abdulkadir Aydin

Defendant/appellant

Black Pearl Investments Limited

Defendant/appellant

Onur Air Tasimaclik AS

Defendant/appellant

Magnus Stephensen

Defendant/appellant

Halldor Sigurdarson

Defendant/appellant

Philip Wyatt

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Re Open Appeal Under CPR Part 52.17

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be re-opened under CPR Part 52.17
  2. 2 Whether there was real injustice or exceptional circumstances justifying re-opening
  3. 3 Whether the conduct of the Court of Appeal was unfair or undermined the integrity of the litigation process

Ratio Decidendi

The application to re-open the appeal is dismissed because there is no real injustice, no exceptional circumstances, and no undermining of the integrity of the litigation process. The alleged errors and unfairness are either incorrect, insubstantial, or do not affect the outcome.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application to re-open the appeal is dismissed.