Isaacs v Green [2025] EWHC 1951 (Fam) (25 July 2025)

Isaacs v Green [2025] EWHC 1951 (Fam) (25 July 2025)

The will of Sybil Rachael Isaacs failed to make reasonable financial provision for her adult son David Marcus Isaacs, given his financial needs, lack of property, health issues, and dependence on the estate for accommodation. Reasonable financial provision is achieved by awarding David 25% of the residuary estate,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] EWHC 1951 (Fam)
Parties
Claimant: David Marcus Isaacs; First Defendant: Michael Anthony Green (as personal representative of the estate of Sybil Rachael Isaacs deceased); Second Defendant: Ruth Simone Isaacs; Third Defendant: Susan Amelia Ellis-Cohn
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim allowed in part; order for provision in favour of claimant.
Legal Topics
Reasonable Financial Provision, Adult Child Claims, Testamentary Freedom, Maintenance Under Inheritance Act, Distribution of Estate, Competing Beneficiary Needs
Family Law Succession Law Reasonable Financial Provision Adult Child Claims Testamentary Freedom Maintenance Under Inheritance Act Distribution of Estate Competing Beneficiary Needs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 17
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Marcus Isaacs

Claimant

Michael Anthony Green (as personal representative of the estate of Sybil Rachael Isaacs deceased)

First Defendant

Ruth Simone Isaacs

Second Defendant

Susan Amelia Ellis-Cohn

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 Claim / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the will of Sybil Rachael Isaacs failed to make reasonable financial provision for her adult son David Marcus Isaacs under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
  2. 2 What order should be made to achieve reasonable financial provision for the claimant, balancing the needs of all beneficiaries

Ratio Decidendi

The will of Sybil Rachael Isaacs failed to make reasonable financial provision for her adult son David Marcus Isaacs, given his financial needs, lack of property, health issues, and dependence on the estate for accommodation. Reasonable financial provision is achieved by awarding David 25% of the residuary estate, with the balance to be shared equally between Ruth and Susan, as this is sufficient to provide for his maintenance and accommodation needs without unduly prejudicing the other beneficiaries.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part; order for provision in favour of claimant.

Orders

  • David Marcus Isaacs to receive 25% of the residuary estate of Sybil Rachael Isaacs deceased.
  • The balance of the estate to be shared equally between Ruth Simone Isaacs and Susan Amelia Ellis-Cohn.