JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov
The amendments to the Receivership Order are necessary to preserve assets, prevent dissipation, and ensure the effectiveness of the Receivership in light of Mr. Ablyazov's disappearance and recent attempts to deal with assets in breach of court orders. The court is satisfied that the amendments are justified and should be granted.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: JSC BTA Bank; Defendant/applicant: Mukhtar Ablyazov
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Commercial / Application to Amend Receivership Order
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Receivership, Asset Preservation, Freezing Orders, Contempt of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JSC BTA Bank
Claimant/respondent
Mukhtar Ablyazov
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Commercial / Application to Amend Receivership Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to amend the Receivership Order to extend powers of Receivers and Managers over certain companies and assets
- 2 Whether to add further companies and properties to the Receivership Order
- 3 Whether to allow the Receivers to obtain additional information about disclosed assets
Ratio Decidendi
The amendments to the Receivership Order are necessary to preserve assets, prevent dissipation, and ensure the effectiveness of the Receivership in light of Mr. Ablyazov's disappearance and recent attempts to deal with assets in breach of court orders. The court is satisfied that the amendments are justified and should be granted.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Amendments to the Receivership Order as discussed are granted
- Receivers appointed as managers over specified companies
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment