Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company Sal & Anor
Given the Defendants’ persistent and deliberate frustration of enforcement, the practical difficulties of execution abroad, and the absence of convincing evidence that compliance would require breach of foreign law or third-party rights, it is just and convenient to appoint a receiver over the receivables from the 25 projects where CCIC is sole contractor. The order is proportionate and necessary to assist in the collection of the judgment debt. The Lebanese court orders do not prevent compliance, and the Defendants’ arguments based on Lebanese law are unpersuasive. The freezing orders are to be continued, with modifications as set out.
- Parties
- Claimant/judgment Creditor: Munib Masri; Defendant/judgment Debtor: Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL; Defendant/judgment Debtor: Consolidated Contractors (Oil and Gas) Company SAL
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Enforcement / Post Judgment Application for Receivership and Continuation of Freezing Orders
- Outcome
- Receivership order granted in respect of 25 projects where CCIC is sole contractor; freezing orders continued with modifications; further directions to be given on wording of orders.
- Legal Topics
- Receivership in Aid of Execution, Freezing Injunctions, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Comity, Equitable Execution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Munib Masri
Claimant/judgment Creditor
Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL
Defendant/judgment Debtor
Consolidated Contractors (Oil and Gas) Company SAL
Defendant/judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Commercial Enforcement / Post Judgment Application for Receivership and Continuation of Freezing Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a receivership order should be granted over foreign receivables of foreign judgment debtors in aid of execution of an English judgment
- 2 Whether the Defendants are prevented by Lebanese law or court orders from complying with English court orders
- 3 Whether the scope of the receivership order should be limited to certain receivables
Ratio Decidendi
Given the Defendants’ persistent and deliberate frustration of enforcement, the practical difficulties of execution abroad, and the absence of convincing evidence that compliance would require breach of foreign law or third-party rights, it is just and convenient to appoint a receiver over the receivables from the 25 projects where CCIC is sole contractor. The order is proportionate and necessary to assist in the collection of the judgment debt. The Lebanese court orders do not prevent compliance, and the Defendants’ arguments based on Lebanese law are unpersuasive. The freezing orders are to be continued, with modifications as set out.
Court Disposition
Receivership order granted in respect of 25 projects where CCIC is sole contractor; freezing orders continued with modifications; further directions to be given on wording of orders.
Orders
- Appointment of receiver over receivables from 25 specified projects where CCIC is sole contractor (excluding Qatar Shell project)
- Continuation of freezing orders over bank accounts and shares, with requirement for up-to-date information
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment