The London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited v The Kingdom of Spain (M/T ‘Prestige’)
The Spanish Judgment is irreconcilable with the English s. 66 Judgments under Article 34(3) of the Brussels Regulation, precluding its recognition and enforcement in England. Even if Article 34(3) were inapplicable, recognition would be contrary to English public policy under Article 34(1) due to res judicata arising from the Schaff Award. The CJEU Judgment is not binding on the English court as to these issues due to issue estoppel and because it addressed questions not referred. The arbitrator had jurisdiction and power to award equitable compensation for breach of the equitable obligation to arbitrate, but not to grant an injunction or damages in lieu against Spain absent its consent...
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: The London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited; Respondent/claimant: The Kingdom of Spain
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Appeal and Arbitration Act Applications / Judgment on Appeal and Arbitration Challenges
- Outcome
- Club’s appeal allowed; Spanish Judgment not recognised or enforced; Spain’s s. 67 application dismissed; Spain’s s. 69 appeal dismissed except as to injunction power, which is deferred.
- Legal Topics
- Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments, Arbitration Awards, Res Judicata, Public Policy Exception, State Immunity, Anti Suit Injunctions, EU Law—brussels Regulation, Equitable Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited
Appellant/defendant
The Kingdom of Spain
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Appeal and Arbitration Act Applications / Judgment on Appeal and Arbitration Challenges
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Spanish Judgment is irreconcilable with the English s. 66 Judgments under Article 34(3) of the Brussels Regulation
- 2 Whether recognition of the Spanish Judgment should be refused on public policy grounds (res judicata) under Article 34(1)
- 3 Effect and binding nature of the CJEU Judgment on the English court and arbitral tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The Spanish Judgment is irreconcilable with the English s. 66 Judgments under Article 34(3) of the Brussels Regulation, precluding its recognition and enforcement in England. Even if Article 34(3) were inapplicable, recognition would be contrary to English public policy under Article 34(1) due to res judicata arising from the Schaff Award. The CJEU Judgment is not binding on the English court as to these issues due to issue estoppel and because it addressed questions not referred. The arbitrator had jurisdiction and power to award equitable compensation for breach of the equitable obligation to arbitrate, but not to grant an injunction or damages in lieu against Spain absent its consent...
Court Disposition
Club’s appeal allowed; Spanish Judgment not recognised or enforced; Spain’s s. 67 application dismissed; Spain’s s. 69 appeal dismissed except as to injunction power, which is deferred.
Orders
- Spanish Judgment not to be recognised or enforced in England and Wales under Article 34(3) and/or Article 34(1) of the Brussels Regulation.
- Spain’s s. 67 AA 1996 application dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment